|
 
A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE SOUTHEAST UNIVERSITY
NEIGHBORHOOD …
As Syracuse grew from a small crossroads trading town to a
bustling business center fed by the Erie Canal and railroads
during the 19th century, the area south and east of the city
center reaped the rewards of a rather steady and healthy economy,
enlightened political and civic leadership, and enterprising
professional and worker population.
In the mid-1800’s vast farmlands covered the area. Situated
along early travel and trade routes, these agricultural properties
were used primarily for orchards and vineyards and included
farmhouses, barns, greenhouses, and stables. In 1872 Judge
George F. Comstock purchased the 200-acre Stevens Farm, which
was east of Oakwood Cemetery and the newly established Syracuse
University, and extended from E. Genesee Street south to the
Onondaga Town line. From this large property, Comstock donated
a small parcel near the juncture of the Cemetery and University
for use as a public park, with the balance of this land probably
remaining in active agricultural use through leases Comstock
had with local farmers.
Southeast of and contiguous to Comstock’s new holdings,
and including land up to the Meadow Brook, where farms of
various sizes were owned or managed by the Rose, Haffenden,
Hooker and Kimber families. Further east, and south of the
well-known Bastable and Stanton Farms (that is, south of Croton
[Euclid] Avenue, east of Westcott Street) was farmland owned
by the O’Brien and Cathers families.
In 1890, Harry H. Loomis and Welton B. Ostrander began to
market the Westminster Tract, land which was platted the previous
year and extended from Clarke (Clarendon) Street on the north,
Westcott Street on the east, Broad Street on the south, and
Ackerman Avenue on the west. In May of that year, the University
Homestead Tract Association was formed to purchase approximately
40 acres in the Westminster Tract; that is the westernmost
section, which extended from Clarke (Clarendon) south to Broad,
and from Ackerman east to Lancaster Avenue. The intent was
for 150 persons to purchase 236 shares of stock for $500 per
share, paying $2 per week per share for one year. At the end
of the year, each shareholder would provide a security for
the unpaid balance of the assessed value of a lot. As the
shares did not represent specific individual lots, a lottery
was to held at year’s end to assign lots to the shareholders.
In the meantime, Loomis and Ostrander agreed to lay "3
miles of cement sidewalks, stone gutters, grade streets, set
trees and have a street car line in operation." Just
two months later, however, several shareholders took exception
to the terms of the agreement and certain practices by the
Association’s officers. They refused to pay their weekly
allotments and withdrew from the organization. The Association
responded through the courts and, although the exact outcome
has not been verified, it may be that the dissenting shareholders
were able to resign from the Association – which most
likely slowed sales and new construction significantly.
The next year, in October 1891, an auction was held to sell
the remaining 426 lots of the Westminster Tract, with each
approximately 40′ x 130′. Beginning at the summit
of Westminster Hill and its south slope and eventually moving
to lots north of the hill and Croton (Euclid), all lots were
sold for between $200-$710 each – with some individuals
purchasing multiple lots. Within a year, some of the new landowners
built homes for their families on these properties, but many
others sold the lots they had acquired to local real estate
speculators, leading to sporadic development of this outlying
area.
In 1892, Maurice Graves, a successful local businessman and
developer, purchased 105 acres from Judge Comstock’s
widow, Caroline. He likely believed this large parcel, between
the University on the west and the University Homestead Tract
on the east and south of Major Alexander Davis’ country
estate Thornden, would support the logical extension of the
successful residential development, The Highlands.
In 1902, Graves sold 90 acres of this former Comstock property
to the University Heights Land Company, which he had created,
and set about developing the area as a middle-class residential
neighborhood. The platted area included some blocks originally
in The Highlands and extended from University Place and Clarendon
Street on the north, to Sumner Avenue on the east, Poplar
(Stratford) Street on the south, and Comstock Avenue and College
Place on the west.
Both single – and two-family dwellings were constructed
on the Heights’ long narrow lots, with many properties
having a garage in the basement level of the house or as a
detached structure in the rear yard. Although news accounts
described many of the houses as "bungalows", these
new residences reflected a range of architectural styles popular
at the time, with most being variations of English and Dutch
Colonial Revival. Full-width front porches, bay windows and
decorative shutters were just some of the features that no
doubt made these homes attractive to potential buyers.
Initially development of the Heights was concentrated north
of Euclid Avenue, but the new neighborhood proved to be extremely
popular, allowing Graves and his partners, William Rafferty
and Clarence Congdon, to expand south to the proposed Poplar
Street. They were able to boast that the area offered excellent
neighborhood amenities including paved streets and sidewalks,
electric and sewer service, and easy access to the streetcars.
The streetcar was used as a marketing tool, with the developers
claiming that the lots in University Heights were serviced
every 6 minutes by the Euclid streetcar line, making the trip
to downtown in only 10 minutes. As a result, from 1911-1915
it was reported that houses were built at a rate of one for
each working day. And in 1914, sixteen houses were constructed
on Ostrom, Livingston, and Sumner in the expanded area.
In 1908, just prior to University Heights reaching its peak
of development, Congdon purchased forty-one acres south of
Poplar (Stratford) from his partners, land that was being
held by their company for further expansion of The Heights.
A Syracuse University-trained architect, Congdon radically
altered the initial design for the area. Rather than extending
the grid pattern found in University Heights, he designed
the subdivision to conform to the natural contours of the
parcel’s dominant topographic feature, a drumlin. Congdon
worked closely with his former partners to secure sewer service
to the area, and when it became a reality in 1911, the development
and promotion of Berkeley Park began in earnest. The overall
layout for the subdivision resulted in wide, deep lots with
generous setbacks, a sinuous road and sidewalk system, and
substantial vegetation that included 150-year old oaks as
well as substantial new plantings. The buildings were designed
in the various revival styles by noted architects including
Ward Wellington Ward, Gordon Wright, Merton Elwood Granger,
and Dwight James Baum. The target market was upper and upper-middle
income families, and buyers ultimately included long-established
citizens and the next generation of community leaders. Congdon
was the primary agent for the subdivision and had sold 28%
of the lots by 1919, when he left to manage the Scotholm development.
His success, however, continued with 80% of lots sold and
houses built on them by 1928, 90% by 1932.
In addition to University Heights and Berkeley Park, less
formal residential development expanded the city further east
during the early 20th century. Intermittent sale and development
of lots in the Westminster and University Homestead Tracts
continued, as did sale and conversion of the last farms into
additional land for housing. The increased number of new residents
demanded municipal services such as fire protection and neighborhood
schools. Fire Station No. 10 at the intersection of Euclid
and Westcott Street (today the Westcott Community Center)
provided neighborhood-based emergency services to the new
residents. Edward Smith Elementary School at the corner of
Broad and Lancaster was built to accommodate the growing number
of school age children. Increasingly active recreational needs
were met when the former Davis estate was transformed into
Thornden Park.
During the 1930s and early 1940s, neighborhood growth slowed
considerably as a result of the Depression and onset of World
War II. But by the end of the 1940s, and into the post-war
years, the city’s southeast side was once again the focus
of intense residential development.
With changes in cultural influences and preferences, however,
neighborhood streets and houses took on a decidedly different
aesthetic from previous decades. Lots were less deep, with
the longest dimension placed along the street frontage. Few,
if any buildings were individually designed, and most were
based on one of a limited number of standard floor plans.
Houses were less elaborate in both size and degree of architectural
detail, and often lacked front porches, expansive windows,
and exterior decoration. Two house types soon occupied many
of the lots in this outermost edge of the neighborhoods. One,
commonly referred to as a Cape Cod, took its general form
from the traditional Eclectic style house, but lacked its
decorative aspects. The other, the Ranch, was loosely based
on the rambling form of Spanish Colonial houses in the American
Southwest, minus any ornamental embellishments.
The once again expanding population demanded increased city
services, and in partial response the city developed Barry
Park to meet neighborhood recreational needs. Built during
an era of open space design, the primary purpose of the Park
was to accommodate active recreation by providing for field
sports. At about the same time, the adjacent lands and Meadow
Brook were identified as critical to flood control for the
surrounding low-lying land. Ultimately they were incorporated
in the Onondaga County Meadowbrook Flood Retention System,
effectively expanding park opportunities by allowing for passive
recreation on the flood control lands.
From the mid-1960s to the mid-80s, the southeast neighborhood
saw a huge increase in their population, mostly from the great
influx of baby-boomers attending the local universities and
colleges. At first, these transient residents rented the flats
found in many of the two-family dwellings built as part of
the University Heights, the Westminster and University Homestead
Tracts, or other early 20th century development ventures.
For at least two decades, the off-campus student population
steadily increased and, coupled with other factors, changed
neighborhood dynamics. Gradually many permanent residents
moved out of the area and single-family homes were converted
to student rentals. By the late 1980s, however, that trend
was stopped and conditions reversed. The number of students
– living both on and off campus – dropped considerably,
reducing the demand for rental units in the neighborhoods.
At the same time, many first-time homebuyers flocked to the
area for its attractive housing stock, excellent elementary
school, extensive parks, and proximity to University Hill
and Downtown Syracuse. The result has been the rehabilitation
of numerous older houses for owner-occupancy and a better
balance between the number of permanent and transient residents
throughout the area. The population is now an exciting mix
of owner-occupants and renters, young professionals, families
and seniors, life-long Syracusans and individuals from a variety
of communities around the world.
From the time the first farms began to give way to more intense
urban development, local civic and political leaders realized
the economic and cultural value of the dramatic natural features
in the community’s southeast sector. In addition, they
understood the importance of building city neighborhoods here
that offered a variety of housing options and architectural
styles. They also recognized the need to support neighborhood
populations that were economically mixed.
Today, Syracusans of the southeast neighborhoods continue
to appreciate both the tangible and intangible value of the
area’s spectacular topography and urban forest. They
are proud of the attractive houses and apartments they call
home. And they celebrate the economic and cultural diversity
that defines the resident population. The very characteristics
that originally gave birth to the southeast neighborhoods
continue to provide their residents with an outstanding quality
of life today.
Christine Capella Peters
Resident, Historic Preservationist
Officer, UNPA Board of Directors

|